Smart Buyer
  • Categories
    • Buying Guides
    • Components
    • DIY and How-to
    • Industry Trends
    • NetSec
    • Networking
    • Storage
    • Systems – PC & Laptop
    • Windows
  • About
  • Why NeweggBusiness?
  • Contact Us
Top Posts
5 Ways to Stream from PC to TV...
PC Cooling: How to Set up Computer Case...
2019 How-to Guide: Small Office Network Setup
2019 Solid State Drive (SSD) Buying Guide
How to Choose the Correct RAM Upgrade
Four Apps that Make Your Tablet a Second...
How to Troubleshoot a PC Power Supply
Wireless Router Running Hot? Cool It Down the...
Computer Monitor Buying Guide 2019
Born in the USA: Computer Hardware Made in...

Smart Buyer

  • Categories
    • Buying Guides
    • Components
    • DIY and How-to
    • Industry Trends
    • NetSec
    • Networking
    • Storage
    • Systems – PC & Laptop
    • Windows
  • About
  • Why NeweggBusiness?
  • Contact Us

Brand wars in the hard disk drive (HDD) realm can be a heated affair. Recently, online backup provider Backblaze stoked the flames by issuing a comparison of HDDs they deploy in their operation, in an attempt to show how they measure HDD reliability. Storage experts are still grumbling over the findings—Backblaze contends that certain HDD brands failed at rates triple that of other brands, and proposed that consumer models outperform enterprise models.

Shortly after the report was published, storage experts took to the Internet penning articles that called Backblaze’s methods dubious, and their findings misleading.  We’ll attempt to sort out the arguments for and against this controversial test, and in the process, show how this type of research should be taken with a grain of salt—especially when it pits brand versus brand.

The (In)Famous Backblaze Test

Backblaze uses over 34,000 HDDs in its operation, a combination of Seagate, Hitachi (now part of HGST), and Western Digital devices. Whenever a drive needed replacing, they logged it as a failure. They counted up all the failures by model, and divided the frequency of failures against the number of drives in use. They took into account the average age of each group of specific models, reporting that alongside the annual failure rate. They reported twice; once in January and once in September.

Here’s a graph of the failure rate that sparked the most controversy.
HDD graph

At first glance, the story looks like the Seagate Barracuda LP 1.5 TB and the Seagate Barracuda 7200 1.5 TB are to be avoided. Counter-intuitively, though, Backblaze engineer and report writer Brian Beach notes that his company deploys more Seagate drives than any other brand, citing that Seagate boasts a combination of consistent (but not great) performance and good pricing. Additionally, at the time of the January report, he said that Backblaze was focused on purchasing mostly Seagate Desktop HDD. 15 4 TB, as well as Western Digital Red 3 TB models, for the HDD pods he deployed.

You might think that given the results, Backblaze would have been snapping up as many Hitachi GST Deskstar 7K3000 and Hitachi GST Deskstar 5K3000 as it could get its hands on, but that wasn’t the case—and detractors would call Backblaze on this.

But the number one issue that storage experts had with the report was the proposition that an enterprise model with a zero failure rate takes too long (10 years) to “break even” against cheaper consumer drives with 15 percent failure rate—and that in Backblaze’s findings, consumer drives were slightly more reliable.

The Backblaze Backlash 

Storage technology analyst Dan Olds took issue with the small sample size of the enterprise HDDs in Backblaze’s report, which compared 14,719 drive-years of consumer disks versus 368 drive-years of service on enterprise disks. This except is from The Register:

quote_Olds

Henry Newman, CEO of storage architecture company Instrumental Inc. and a prominent voice in storage, took Backblaze to school on several issues as well. First, he points out that Backblaze’s 1.5 TB Seagate models were almost eight years old, information that was left out of the study: “It is well known in study after study that disk drives last about 5 years and no other drive is that old,” he writes. “I find it pretty disingenuous to leave out that information.” He adds: “It is no surprise that these old drives are failing. Average [ages] are a pretty useless statistic, and if Seagate drives are so bad then why buy so many new drives? ”

Newman goes on to address the other end of the spectrum, touching on brand new drives, which have, as he calls them, issues with “infant mortality.” He elaborates: “Drive vendors talk about it, RAID vendors talk about it, but there is not a single mention of what, if anything is done in the Backblaze environment or how that figures into any of the calculations.”

The Backblaze study also caught a lot of flak on Spiceworks and other discussion boards. IT professionals deploying storage arrays questioned Backblaze’s infrastructure model. Also, some called into question why anyone would install enterprise model HDDs alongside consumer drives in conditions “not even remotely compliant with manufacturer specs,” according to one popular commenter.

Overall, the advice eschewed by Olds, Newman, and the IT community weighing in on the discussion boards: When looking at any third party research or consumer reviews of HDDs consumers should understand their needs and uses for the gear they’re buying, and deploy it within manufacturer specifications. While it was noble of Backblaze to share its business intelligence, the inherent problems here are that every storage need is unique, and their own environment may not be optimal for running enterprise-grade equipment.

Some key takeaways from all the back-and-forth:

  • Enterprise-grade HDDs come with a 3-year warranty. Possibly the best way to fool-proof your investment.
  • Doing your own testing is beyond the resources of most SMBs, and third party reliability claims must be taken with a grain of salt.
  • HDDs from all vendors can and do fail.
  • Statistical historical data does not indicate future results—your results will vary from the mean because that’s how statistics work.
  • We would be curious how something like Seagate Constellation enterprise HDDs (for example) would hold up in the Backblaze environment since it is designed for datacenter use.

Undoubtedly, the best price point per-GB storage will remain the most common deciding factor for HDD purchasing.  Nonetheless, it is still good practice to keep these perspectives in mind when selecting the best hard disk drive for your operation.

Photo by Jeff Kubina, taken from Flickr Creative Commons
Adam Lovinus

Adam Lovinus

A tech writer and Raspberry Pi enthusiast from Orange County, California.

More Posts - Website - Twitter - LinkedIn - Google Plus

data storagehard drivesHDD
3 comments
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +PinterestEmail
Adam Lovinus
Adam Lovinus

A tech writer and Raspberry Pi enthusiast from Orange County, California.

previous post
Brian Eno, Robert Fripp and Windows Startup Sounds
next post
Business Lessons I Learned from MMORPGs

Related Posts

How Helium Drives Captured a Black Hole

September 20, 2019

RAID Basics: How Your Business Can Benefit

July 19, 2019

Best Selling SSDs for Business Systems 2018

December 20, 2018

How-to Guide: Installing an SSD Into a Laptop

December 6, 2018

Enterprise vs. Desktop Hard Drives – 5 Notable...

November 19, 2018

Commonplace Software Licensing Audit Triggers to Avoid

June 7, 2018

It’s HAMR Time for Next-Gen Enterprise HDDs

May 3, 2018

Earn Money When Recycling Computers: Tips for SMBs

April 24, 2018

12 Elements of an IT Disaster Recovery Plan

March 29, 2018

Digital Gold: Reinventing Money One Hash at a...

December 13, 2017

3 comments

How to Thwart Hard Drive Reliability Killers - HardBoiled August 12, 2015 - 6:04 pm

[…] on the reliability of the hard drives it uses. Bear in mind the reports should be taken with a grain of salt, and your drive usage likely differs from that of a cloud storage […]

Reply
[Infographic] Hard Drive Manufacturer Genealogy - HardBoiled September 8, 2015 - 9:17 am

[…] Cutting Through the Noise of Hard Drive Brand Wars […]

Reply
HDD or SSD? How to Buy Hard Disk Storage in 2016 - HardBoiled January 18, 2016 - 10:59 am

[…] wear out over time. In recent years, cloud storage provider BackBlaze released data about which hard drive brands are the most reliable in their datacenter, but these methods were met with controversy in storage […]

Reply

What's your take? Cancel reply

Subscribe

  • 1

    5 Ways to Stream from PC to TV or Digital Display

    May 23, 2016
  • 2

    PC Cooling: How to Set up Computer Case Fans

    September 25, 2015
  • 3

    2019 How-to Guide: Small Office Network Setup

    December 20, 2018
  • 4

    2019 Solid State Drive (SSD) Buying Guide

    December 6, 2018
  • 5

    How to Choose the Correct RAM Upgrade

    April 28, 2015
  • 6

    Four Apps that Make Your Tablet a Second Monitor

    January 9, 2018
  • 7

    How to Troubleshoot a PC Power Supply

    July 11, 2018
  • 8

    Wireless Router Running Hot? Cool It Down the Easy Way

    December 9, 2016
  • 9

    Computer Monitor Buying Guide 2019

    January 4, 2019
  • 10

    Born in the USA: Computer Hardware Made in America

    September 27, 2018

Newegg + Business

How is this different from Newegg.com?

Why NeweggBusiness?
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Email
  • RSS